16.2 C
Wolfsburg
Saturday, April 25, 2026

A cross to bear | Dallas Opera Assessment – Don Carlo


Photograph by Kyle Flubacker

Ascending the elevator to Winspear Opera Home in Dallas, Texas, appears like climbing into an enormous glass spaceship. Ground to ceiling home windows tower above its atrium, and the glowing pink inside exudes a modern, Loss of life Star attraction. Dallas Opera’s Don Carlo promised a real spectacle, boasting a starry forged and a home famend for its acoustics. Workers in any respect ranges had been courteous, variety, and accommodating. Attendees ranged from younger college students to fashionable hipsters to white-haired grandees. Sequins sparkled within the dim atmosphere. Within the auditorium, multicolor lances plunged downward in a spectacular chandelier, retracting into pinprick stars because the lights dimmed. The scene was set for a particular night – and a particular night was what we obtained.

When Stephen Costello, taking part in the title function, started Don Carlo’s Fontainebleau aria in Act I, one realized that the energy of the present can be the music. Costello is fitted to this function. Regardless of a couple of early dropped notes, the tenor stayed on even footing all through the night time. Costello was notably robust in his scenes with Elisabetta, sending notes of despair slicing throughout the viewers as the 2 wrap themselves in a duet of plaintive, forbidden love. Etienne Dupuis as Rodrigo, the good-guy bosom-brother of Don Carlo, leans into his capacity to convey fraternal love with a heat, noble baritone. Dupuis’ “Per me giunto…O Carlo, ascolta”, is an aching factor. His musical sensitivity is astonishing. Some play Rodrigo’s sacrifice as defiant, others as unhappy and inevitable. Dupuis chooses the latter, easing on and off the vocal gasoline with surging fortissimi and delicate diminuendi. As my companions (each Don Carlo first-timers) identified, the plot doesn’t absolutely put together one for Rodrigo’s sudden loss of life. It takes a standout efficiency of this sequence to realize credibility, and Dupuis delivered.

Christian Van Horn as King Philip is a power to behold. Bodily imposing, Van Horn combines an intimidating stage presence with a resonant, butterscotch bass-baritone befitting a king. The centerpiece of the function is Philip’s Act III showstopper, “Ella giammai m’amò.” It was laborious to inform whether or not his interpretation was rushed at instances, or the orchestra merely lagged. There was a second when Van Horn, throughout the King’s aria, opened his mouth and poured out a cascade of sound, subtly turning his head in anguish, filling the home with a virile energy, like heat water from a hose. In his podcast, Van Horn has mentioned that he’s ready his complete life for the function. His aim is to play Philip in each main home on the planet. One can solely hope he does.

In her backyard scene, Clementine Margaine, taking part in the Princess Eboli, sounded thick-voiced at first, however gained energy in her “O don fatale,” as her voice full of anguish and dedication. Nicole Automobile was Elizabeth. Her quicksilver voice performed cool and bitter throughout “Tu che la vanità.” Automobile is a wonderful singing actor whose grace and stage presence portrayed the despairing queen with fatalistic dignity. Rounding out the main forged was the cavernous bass Morris Robinson, whose tectonic voice and presence lent a great aura of terror to his Grand Inquisitor.

Photo by Kyle FlubackerPhoto by Kyle Flubacker

The route was much less spectacular. In his program notice, director Louis Want argues persuasively for Don Carlo’s enduring energy and relevance: “It might appear unusual, however Don Carlo isn’t a love story,” he writes. “Right here, time drifts with out ever therapeutic a wound.” Want needs us contained in the minds of the protagonists; he urges us to acknowledge the restrictions of power via “symbols of an influence already cracking, of a monarchy kneeling beneath the load of a extra horrible throne.” This can be a imaginative and prescient for our time. Sadly, the projections, lighting, blocking, and set design had been insufficient to the duty of conveying the common, ineffable, and maybe – as Verdi suggests – inevitable forces shaping and finally destroying the lives of the principals.

The excessive water mark of those supporting inventive forces got here firstly of the present – disembodied palms claw the curtains again to Don Carlo standing on a damaged cross, bathed in a highlight, flakes of ashes swirling round him. A black-voiced monk – the bass Raymond Aceto – sings offstage, and a clutch of dark-cloaked figures stand to the aspect, immobile and ready. Carlo is shivering; the ashes may effectively be snow or leaves. A projection of an enormous bare corpse – presumably that of Charles V, but in addition an apparent allusion to the themes of mortality and hubris all through Don Carlo – emerges into the enormous display screen above. The orchestra – in glorious kind beneath the baton of Emmanuel Villaume – rose and fell in a wash of browns, golds, and reds, at instances glowing, at others, ominous, and at all times crisp. All of those parts created a startling sonic and visible impact.

Sadly, the novelty of the tableau wore off rapidly. Diego Mendez-Casariego’s set design is anchored by a toppled cross that, whereas evocative at first, turned an inert signifier. The dark-cloaked figures slowly shuffled off-stage with out imparting a lot of the theocratic dread illustrated by Verdi’s shadowy rating. In Act III, ropes descend like serpents to the stage, denoting an summary jail – efficient as visible theater, however nonsensical in apply. When Rodrigo visits Don Carlo in jail, the infante grips the rope, presumably tied up for interrogation, which requires an pointless imaginative leap – even by opera’s requirements.

Photo by Kyle FlubackerPhoto by Kyle Flubacker

Among the night time’s shortcomings got here right down to execution, some to conception, some to each. Take into account the lighting. “To provide these younger characters the cinematic depth their tragedy deserves,” Want writes, “gentle and projection will carve the area, shifting it consistently, so that every second appears to breathe, to shimmer, to vary its pores and skin.” Lighting, due to this fact, is a important part to the director’s imaginative and prescient. It failed each in execution and design. Led (in a last-minute program change) by lighting designer Driscoll Otto and projection designer Zachary Borovay, the projections – with the notable exception of the enormous bare corpse looming over the individuals like a cosmic grand inquisitor – had been flat and uninspiring. The Act I scene I backyard scene is accompanied by a pixelated projection of manicured hedges straight out of a late ‘90s online game, the mood-lit backdrop a paltry substitute for significant world-building. There was even a second in Act III the place the highlight shone towards the supertitles for an prolonged time, and all through the present, there have been abrupt adjustments in its hue and depth.

Even the costumes didn’t help the dynamic performances of the orchestra and vocalists. Based on the director, the costumes are supposed to evoke a sense of “not [belonging] to any nation or metropolis.” However from the viewers, the costumes – led once more by Mendez-Casariego, doubling as costume designer – landed someplace between Renaissance Honest and Star Wars, reaching the impact of neither. The blocking vacillated between “park and bark” and awkward and sensitive in a means that, in line with certainly one of my companions, felt (pejoratively) “sweaty.” Don Carlo and Rodrigo, as an illustration, maintain palms and stroll slowly forwards and backwards, angled, at instances, away from the viewers, disconnecting us from the flood of lovely singing. Within the famed scene between the King and Grand Inquisitor, Robinson grabs Van Horn’s hand in a type of loss of life grip, at odds with the important infirmity of his character.

One hopes that a few of these miscues is perhaps chalked as much as opening night time inconsistencies, however I worry that the inventive group’s imaginative and prescient might exceed its grasp. In any case, this can be a Don Carlo to listen to in the home.

Brendan Latimer

Brendan Latimer is a author and concrete planner based mostly in Baltimore, MD. He first fell in love with opera as a child watching Met productions on laserdisc along with his dad, who was a lover and collector of all issues opera. In highschool, Brendan performed the clarinet line of Otello, which continues to be his favourite work. Professionally, Brendan is excited by narrative historical past and the intersection of society and the constructed surroundings. Along with opera, he enjoys watching baseball and taking part in along with his tuxedo cat, Cholla (pronounced cho-yah). Yow will discover Brendan on Instagram at b_lat_

Related Articles

Latest Articles