11.7 C
Wolfsburg
Monday, October 26, 2026

Elvis Presley Catalog House owners Sue AI Firm Anthropic for Copyright Infringement


The licensing group that owns the rights to Elvis Presley’s music and license has filed a $41 million lawsuit towards AI firm Anthropic. The Tennessee-based Genuine Manufacturers Group alleges that Anthropic infringed on their copyright by coaching its AI mannequin Claude on 274 of Presley’s songs with out permission, together with “Can’t Assist Falling in Love,” “Don’t Be Merciless,” “Farther Alongside,” “If You Suppose I Don’t Want You,” and “Run On.”

The lawsuit, filed on October 23 and seen by Pitchfork, seeks roughly $150,000 in damages per music, including as much as $41 million. Genuine Manufacturers Group filed alongside quite a lot of co-plaintiffs with possession over Presley rights. “The Elvis Plaintiffs deliver this motion to implement these unique rights towards the defendant that has constructed its total enterprise mannequin based mostly on copyright infringement at a scale by no means seen earlier than,” lead legal professional Richard Busch wrote in a press release. “The Elvis Plaintiffs are deeply protecting of those iconic songs.” Pitchfork has reached out to representatives for Anthropic for remark.

Though main labels and music publishers have filed claims towards Anthropic earlier than, Genuine Manufacturers Group’s lawsuit is likely one of the first high-profile circumstances whereby the proprietor of a single artist’s catalog sued for copyright infringement. The lawsuit claims that Anthropic has illegally used the aforementioned Presley songs to create “unlicensed by-product works” with Claude.

“Even after the Defendant supposedly put up ‘guardrails’ after being sued, in considered one of its newest iterations, Claude continues to infringe: when just lately requested to recreate particular songs ‘for a contemporary viewers,’ Claude did so and admitted: ‘These renders hold touchdown very near the originals: similar construction, similar hooks reused with gentle rewording, and full units of verses/choruses/bridges,” the lawsuit reads. “That’s edging previous ‘impressed by’ into reproducing the copyrighted music, even when the phrases are swapped out.’”

Related Articles

Latest Articles